Things that Need to Get Done
The following is my opinion. It does NOT directly relate to agriculture, but of course everything relates to agriculture at some point. It is the result of a lot of study and thought, but it is, by no means a final product. Some aspects may be controversial or triggering for some. I have tried to keep the points short. Time permitting, I will fill in detail and references later. I hope it stimulates constructive feedback and discussion.
- Ensure a free and legitimate Press
- Eliminate Money in Politics
- Provide a comprehensive social safety net
- Tax the Rich
- Election Reform
- Restructure land inheritance to protect farmers, ranchers and conservationists
- Ensure Competition and at least some domestic production capabilities
- Free single-payer Healthcare for all
- Free K-undergraduate college for all
- Forbid Corporations from putting shareholder interests above National Interests
- Require government entities to migrate to open-source software
- Turn administration of National Parks and National Forests over to local First Nations tribes who once lived there
- Elimination of "blood quantum" for tribal membership and replace with largely tribally-defined merit-based membership
- Comprehensive Immigration Reform
Ensure a Free and Legitimate Press
- All outlets (all media, including TV, radio, social media platforms and newspapers) must allow equal time to non-violent opposing views or lose license to broadcast.
- Reverse Clinton’s Telecommunications Act so that local media cannot be owned by outsiders and no person or group can own or operate more than one local media platform.
- Bring back and strengthen Voice of America, Radio Liberty and other American news organizations that were recently eliminated.
- Nationalize, with independent, publicly-elected management funded directly by Congress, all social media platforms with viewership above a certain threshold (e.g. >1% of the population) and remove the profit motive for their existence.
- Require news to be provided at standard times or lose license to broadcast for any outlet purporting to provide news of any kind.
Eliminate Money in Politics
- Ban all political advertising. Candidates and their supporters can knock on doors, talk to people in person, including be interviewed by the press and would be strongly encouraged to answer questions on a central website available to the public, but otherwise all political advertisements and unsolicited phone calls would be prohibited. (See “Election Reform” section, part “f” for more details about the website).
- Ban all political fundraising. Obviously, with campaign information distributed by the described web-based resource in a predictable way, campaigns could be run without much expense to themselves or the public.
- Ban monetary or any gifts of value to candidates or government officials.
Provide a comprehensive social safety net
This is crucial because it allows so many good things to flourish. The list of benefits is too long for me to pretend to be comprehensive, but one of the main arguments against it is that (to be read in a whiny, nasal voice), “People won’t work anymore. It’s just human nature. If you give people handouts, they’ll just do nothing.” Although you will see some people that sit on their asses, the vast majority of people enjoy being productive and peer pressure from this majority is a sufficient incentive to get those unfamiliar with honest labor to give it a try. Human nature is to be creative and be useful to others. When folks trot out these tired assertions about “human nature”, they typically base them on the so-called “civilized world”, which has been around 1-2000 years at most. Perhaps when we talk about “human nature”, we really should focus on the 300,000 years or so of our species’ existence before that, but I digress. In addition, when evaluating the effects of social safety nets, there have been numerous studies showing that people become more productive and make better life decisions when they are freed from fear of homelessness and financial collapse (e.g. the Dauphin, Canada experiment).
- Basic guaranteed income for every adult citizen in the USA, not tied to anything other than you are alive, an American citizen and primarily reside in the USA. Adults would receive extra income to support up to two children per couple to cover child care.
- Additional income for those who work for the government based on their function and effectiveness. (Of course private enterprises would also be expected to provide additional income or they likely couldn’t attract workers!) Raises for all public-facing government employees would be influenced by public input. Effective teams would receive raises together, instead of just their most-visible “leader”.
- Public services such as rail, buses, health care, basic electricity, water and sewage would be provided free-of-charge. Water and electricity use above the basic level would require payment. Sewage would be gradually transitioned to more modern, sanitary technologies by providing free sewage to those who adopted Jenkins-type toilets, while older less-sanitary methods would require payment.
- Employees would never have to stay in a job that they hated or feel forced to work for asshole bosses because they wouldn’t lose their home, health insurance, etc by seeking more interesting employment. Similarly, folks willing to do less-glamorous tasks, such as sewage maintenance or custodial work would likely command higher salaries as companies and government agencies sought their services.
- The flip side to that coin is that government agencies could fire unproductive employees with little hesitation because, though the fired employee might lose status and some pay, they would not lose any basic need. These employees would be free to find employment that is more-suitable to their skills.
Tax the Rich
- Eliminate ALL taxes EXCEPT one: a luxury tax. Luxury is defined as anything unecessary for a healthy life. Thus, private swimming pools, jewelry, etc. would be taxed, but also things that, in their basic form are necessities, but were acquired in an excessive form. For example, 25 m2 (323 ft2) is adequate shelter, if well-built, for a single person. Anything over that would be taxed at progressively higher rates while anything this size or smaller would avoid all taxes. Similarly, personal vehicles would be taxed according to their external volume and pollution footprint. Thus, small electric vehicles (or larger electric vehicles that are truly needed for the person’s work, for instance) would not be taxed at all, while large and more-polluting vehicles would be taxed at progressively higher rates as their size and pollution capacity increased. Nutritious food would not be taxed at all, but highly-processed snacks would be taxed. The end result would be the poor and lower middle class would pay no tax, the rich would pay a lot of tax and the rest of the middle class would pay a small amount of taxes. All folks would be incentivized to live modestly. As the modern era has conclusively proven, wasteful consumerism doesn't lead to happiness.
- Educate the public on the true purpose of taxation and then tax accordingly. Taxes, if levied appropriately, serve two purposes: 1) reduce inflation & 2) ensure that a democratically-elected government, not oligarchs, have the power. In a monetary sovereign, like the United States federal government (not state and local), taxes are not necessary to pay for government programs! We all know the elements of this truth, yet we are taught to believe that taxes pay the government’s bills! We all know that the U.S. Treasury prints money (or makes it appear in accounts it wishes electronically). Such printing is authorized by Congress. Thus, the federal government could pay all its debts overnight without collecting a single tax dollar. They don’t do this because it would stimulate inflation. We all understand that the total amount of U.S. dollars in the world = [($$ in the hands of the government) + ($$ in the hands of everyone else)]. Yet, we are taught that the government should manage federal money like households manage their bank accounts! That would be disastrous, as it was just prior to Hoover’s Great Depression! The government’s debt is to our benefit because it means the money is circulating in the private economy. If this sounds like the Cliff Notes of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), you are correct. MMT simply describes how our monetary system was designed, it’s nothing new. What would be new is to actually make policy in line with our monetary system! For more information on MMT, I highly recommend reading, “The Deficit Myth” by economist Stephanie Kelton.
- Fully fund and expand the Internal Revenue Service to ensure that the rich don’t use their resources to weasel out of paying their fair share the way they routinely do now.
- Divide national budgets among the federal government and state and local governments. That apportioned to state and local governments would be in-total a fixed percentage of the federal budget and this portion would be divided based on their population with law requiring that the money be given, without delay to prevent intimidation of state and local governments through withholding funds. More research is required as to what percentage is appropriate and exceptions could be made in times of declared war so that the military budget money could be increased as necessary for national defense.
Election Reform
a) Automatic Voter Registration: Every U.S. citizen would be automatically registered to vote upon reaching age 18 unless disqualified by felony conviction or diagnosis of debilitating mental impairment.
b) Mandatory Voting: Australia has been doing this for over 100 years! Basically, every citizen must vote in each election or pay a nominal fine.
c) Eliminate Political Parties: George Washington despised political parties. Each candidate should be allowed to craft their personal platform. Political parties encourage tribalism and a lazy electorate.
d) Institute Ranked-Choice Voting: For offices held by a single person (e.g. President, Governor, Mayor, etc.), this would take the form of Single-Winner Ranked-Choice voting and in cases where a multi-person body is being chosen, if would be Propportional Ranked-Choice voting. Ranked-Choice Voting ensures your vote will not be "wasted" even if your top preference is someone who is not generally popular or well-known.
e) Reduce campaign season: Do we really learn much more about a candidate in the second year of their campaign? No. With well-organized elections, one can do your homework in a couple of months and then get back to your life.
f) Set up a public, national website for candidate information and make this resource available to local and state election boards for use in non-federal elections as well. Folks would quickly get the idea for where to go for candidate information. It allows elimination of money requirements in political campaigns (covered in the "Eliminate Money in Politics" section), thus allowing ANYONE to run for office regardless of their financial situation and could banish the clownish political theater that currently dominates political races. The candidates would be presented with a standard set of questions tailored to each office. 50% of these questions would be suggested and sufficiently up-voted by the general public and the other 50% would be provided by a pool of professional journalists who cover the relevant area. If the candidate wanted to provide more information, they could do so in an attachment.
g) Make Election Day a national holiday.
h) Make it illegal for any employer to prevent or punish worker from taking 2 hour leave on day of local/state elections in order to participate in these non-national elections.
Restructure land inheritance to protect farmers, ranchers and conservationists
Currently, when a farmer or rancher dies, they rely on their children or the market to continue stewarding the land. Many times the children have moved away and/or don’t want to take over the operation. At this point, the lifetime work of the dying farmer is put up for sale and its future is at the mercy of the market. Millions of acres of productive farmland and wildlife preservation area has already been lost to greedy developers and more is at risk every year. British Columbia wisely enacted the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) to inhibit loss of farmland to suburbia, but their law is weak and is frequently circumvented by determined speculators. A better approach would be to prohibit loss of productive land outright by allowing farmers and ranchers to put their land into a farm vision matching system. In a nutshell, it would work like this:
- The farmer or rancher would write a document detailing, to some degree, their vision for the farm, listing assets of the land (water sources, fertility, rainfall of the area, conservation areas, etc.), sensible rotations for the short and long-terms and untapped potential.
- Their plan would be reviewed by a regenerative agriculture expert and the document finalized after some discussion between the farmer and regen ag expert. The farmer would have the final say and could, if he/she wished reject the suggestions from the expert.
- This final document would be uploaded to a government “dating” website/app.
- Those wishing to enter agriculture or expand their operation would indicate in the app, their interest in the farm.
- The farmer could then select those applicants who he/she thought were the best match to his/her vision and invite them to work with him on the farm for a time, if he wished.
- After reviewing the applicants either just through the app or additionally through working with the applicants, which applicant would “inherit” his/her farm.
- The farmer’s family would be compensated for their inheritance by either a cash payment or transfer of government property that matched what they wanted.
- If a farmer failed to participate in this system, their family could still participate after their passing by electing to put the land into the system with a minimal description open to any potential farmers.
This system would be greatly strengthened by the “One Tax” system described above because there would be little advantage to greedy speculators (or greedy inheritors) in swooping in to take farmland when the farming family was most vulnerable.
This system would accomplish several important goals, including the farmer’s lifelong work would be preserved and advanced, those who are eager to enter agriculture, but currently can’t afford to do so due to the high up-front costs of land purchase could realize their aspirations and our nation’s food supply and green spaces would be protected.
If there was insufficient participation in the program, a study would be conducted asking the farmers and their families why they chose not to participate. Reasonable adjustments would be made. If input from the farming community failed to increase participation, the program would become mandatory. Preservation of farmland is simply too important to leave to chance.
You may ask why I included “protect conservationists” in the title of this section, yet barely mentioned them afterwards. That is because many farmers care deeply about the land and thus are natural conservationists and would do more in this regard, if they were not pushed to the brink of financial ruin by a rapacious corporate system that has turned many of them from land stewards to land miners.
Ensure Competition and at least some domestic production capabilities
In any key economic sector where we are currently reliant on either a small number of dominant corporations OR foreign powers, start a government industry in this sector. A government-run industry would not have shareholders or a profit motive or pay excessive salaries to their leadership. These government industries would be structured to have fairly independent management, but would be mandated to provide high-quality, albeit basic products at affordable prices. They would also be required to treat their workers with dignity. Failure to follow these basics would lead to management change, otherwise Congress would be restrained from micro-managing.
If a corporation providing a necessary product misbehaves or goes bankrupt, that company’s assets would be acquired, nationalized and made public. The top management would be replaced, but workers would keep their jobs (or be promoted) so that the product would continue being produced, but without the corrupting profit motive. For instance, during the auto bailout of 2008 Chevy and Dodge should have been taken over and merged into a government-run entity that manufactured affordable electric cars, trucks, vans, train cars, locomotives, buses, etc., maintained highest safety and sustainability standards, and paid workers well. The vehicles produced would be basic, no frills vehicles, but high-quality in their functionality and durability.
The postal service would be allowed to provide banking services again. The USPS operated the United States Postal Savings System from 1911 to 1967. Of course, the service would be modernized, but could provide free basic banking services to all Americans and charge small fees for additional banking services. It would not be allowed to engage in risky speculation. As for the auto bailout, the collapsing banks of 2008 should have been acquired and merged into a revived USPSS.
The government should provide basic housing construction, renovation and maintenance services via a government-run, non-profit co-operative. For new housing, there would be a few choices of simple, functional and locally-appropriate units incorporating excellent insulation and self-sufficient energy production, as appropriate to the specific location (e.g. solar panels, micro-hydro, etc.). Options for additional space or upgrades would require full payment and would risk incurring an annual luxury tax, depending of their specific circumstances and needs. Government-acquired old housing would be assessed for structural integrity and historical significance and remodeled as needed to bring it up to or surpass current safety and efficiency standards. This service would also be available to homeowners whose homes are in need of repairs, but can’t afford the cost. Those with more money could hire these government contractors to renovate their homes as well and pay what they could.
What would all this accomplish? There would be many benefits, but some of the most important ones include:
- Ensuring that we are never 100% reliant on foreign nations for products necessary to our national security (food, shelter, clothing, transportation, energy, military goods, communications, banking, pharmaceuticals, etc.).
- Ensuring that we retain the expertise to produce said products.
- Ensuring that these sectors remain competitive, by preventing monopolies which are inherently anti-Capitalism.
- Creating stable, good-paying jobs doing meaningful work for thousands of Americans.
- Ensuring that quality, affordable, albeit non-luxurious necessary products are available to every American.
- Reducing prices overall in these markets because the remaining private companies would always have to compete against someone who has no profit motive.
Free single-payer Healthcare for all
Free K-undergraduate college for all
An educated citizenry is essential to a healthy democracy. American history and civics should be mandatory for graduation. History should be taught without fear or favor. Our nation has made numerous mistakes, but folks should not feel shame about what prior generations have done. They should instead put their minds towards figuring out how to prevent similar missteps from happening again so that our country continues improvement and provides a guiding light to the rest of the world. The most important time is the present, but we cannot meet the challenges of the present without understanding where we came from and what the consequences of prior decisions have been. The main purpose of education is to make better citizens. Although technical information is important, we cannot afford to ignore civic information and critical thinking skills if we want to live in a free society.
Technical school education would also be free, if a student chose that route over a four-year college, but in either case, a demonstration of understanding of the funamentals of how our system functions, critical thinking ability and their responsibilities as citizens would be required for graduation.
Graduate school would be free in public institutions for those who were most-qualified among American citizens.
Forbid Corporations from putting shareholder interests above National Interests
Require government entities to migrate to open-source software
Currently, our citizens are held hostage to proprietary software that is expensive and forces people to purchase software and hardware “upgrades” at the mercy of the profit-driven corporations. Furthermore, even the government is forced to dance to the tune of these private profiteers because their proprietary software has often become so pervasive that the government can’t function without joining the people on the paid update treadmill.
By making open-source software the government standard, the result would be more secure and more transparent and individuals would be freer to perform SOHO and personal computing functions without worry about costly maintenance for no apparent gain.
Turn administration of National Parks and National Forests over to local First Nations tribes who once lived there
There are no people who, in general, care more about these lands than the people whose ancestors lived here for tens of thousands of years. That said, I am under no illusion that all First Nations individuals/ Native Americans are saints.
There would be a stipulation that the land not be “developed” further, though modest, non-destructive housing for tribal members would be OK. Traditional practices that could impact neighboring areas, such as ceremonial burns, would have to be coordinated with local fire departments.
Furthermore, the jobs of our current dedicated park employees would be protected, but new hires would be at the discretion of the First Nations. Current employees could only be fired with cause.
Elimination of "blood quantum" for tribal membership and replace with largely tribally-defined merit-based membership
Currently, tribal membership is based on a federally-instituted requirement that members have a certain percentage of inheritance from a federally-recognized tribe. Even mixing among tribes dilutes one’s blood quantum and thus can make you ineligible for tribal membership even if all your ancestors were native Americans. At least one tribe has formally rejected the blood quantum requirement and has since seen their membership rise. It benefits no one to have this genetic-based membership requirement.
I am suggesting that the government would have a very-limited authority to restrict what constitutes “merit”, just so that flagrant disregard for the environment could be prevented. It is highly unlikely that Native Americans would abuse the environment of their heritage, but stranger things have happened.
Comprehensive Immigration Reform